<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Top 50 Albums of 2009 according to Das Klienicum!  Top 50!!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://slowcoustic.com/2009/12/09/top-50-albums-of-2009-according-to-das-klienicum-top-50/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://slowcoustic.com/2009/12/09/top-50-albums-of-2009-according-to-das-klienicum-top-50/</link>
	<description>The unhurried side of music</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:29:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowcoustic</title>
		<link>http://slowcoustic.com/2009/12/09/top-50-albums-of-2009-according-to-das-klienicum-top-50/comment-page-1/#comment-3526</link>
		<dc:creator>slowcoustic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 19:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slowcoustic.com/?p=3309#comment-3526</guid>
		<description>@DC - I think E. genuinely likes all this music and just that fact that it might be &quot;indie safe&quot; might be beside the point.  I know E. does have quite an extensive listening range, but good music is still good music, and in the ear of the beholder.

On the other hand, It is hard to say, I find myself in common circles and many lists lately do look very similar (don&#039;t get me started on the best of decade lists that can be cut and pasted around numerous blogs).  It&#039;s kind of like a bunch of classic car enthusiasts sitting around saying &quot;the older cars&quot; are soo much better.  Well the pool is going to contain many of the same vehicles (or artists) when talking cars (or indie music).  

That all being said, I always like a dark horse being introduced and often find myself leaning towards a lesser known artist even if another well known artist has an album that is just as pleasing to me...I like left field and a good surprise in a list is always appreciated...  ;-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@DC &#8211; I think E. genuinely likes all this music and just that fact that it might be &#8220;indie safe&#8221; might be beside the point.  I know E. does have quite an extensive listening range, but good music is still good music, and in the ear of the beholder.</p>
<p>On the other hand, It is hard to say, I find myself in common circles and many lists lately do look very similar (don&#8217;t get me started on the best of decade lists that can be cut and pasted around numerous blogs).  It&#8217;s kind of like a bunch of classic car enthusiasts sitting around saying &#8220;the older cars&#8221; are soo much better.  Well the pool is going to contain many of the same vehicles (or artists) when talking cars (or indie music).  </p>
<p>That all being said, I always like a dark horse being introduced and often find myself leaning towards a lesser known artist even if another well known artist has an album that is just as pleasing to me&#8230;I like left field and a good surprise in a list is always appreciated&#8230;  ;-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Drunk Country</title>
		<link>http://slowcoustic.com/2009/12/09/top-50-albums-of-2009-according-to-das-klienicum-top-50/comment-page-1/#comment-3522</link>
		<dc:creator>Drunk Country</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 16:44:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slowcoustic.com/?p=3309#comment-3522</guid>
		<description>Weird thing is, given how much brilliant music the blog generates interest for, given how many entirely different &amp; new artists E exposes, that top 50 of 2009 was quite disappointing for me.  Quite, um, safe.  I genuinely thought it would be more personal, more intriguing, more left field, rather than ticking off from the same list everyone else seems to be lazily referencing.

Not that I&#039;m saying E is lazy - fuck, no - I&#039;m just saying I&#039;m surprised it&#039;s not very diverse given the blog&#039;s variety.  Does that make sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weird thing is, given how much brilliant music the blog generates interest for, given how many entirely different &amp; new artists E exposes, that top 50 of 2009 was quite disappointing for me.  Quite, um, safe.  I genuinely thought it would be more personal, more intriguing, more left field, rather than ticking off from the same list everyone else seems to be lazily referencing.</p>
<p>Not that I&#8217;m saying E is lazy &#8211; fuck, no &#8211; I&#8217;m just saying I&#8217;m surprised it&#8217;s not very diverse given the blog&#8217;s variety.  Does that make sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e.</title>
		<link>http://slowcoustic.com/2009/12/09/top-50-albums-of-2009-according-to-das-klienicum-top-50/comment-page-1/#comment-3521</link>
		<dc:creator>e.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:25:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slowcoustic.com/?p=3309#comment-3521</guid>
		<description>yeah, lee, you&#039;re right. but &quot;july flame&quot; isn&#039;t a leak, onyl a promotion thing. sorry for that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, lee, you&#8217;re right. but &#8220;july flame&#8221; isn&#8217;t a leak, onyl a promotion thing. sorry for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Trini</title>
		<link>http://slowcoustic.com/2009/12/09/top-50-albums-of-2009-according-to-das-klienicum-top-50/comment-page-1/#comment-3520</link>
		<dc:creator>Trini</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 00:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slowcoustic.com/?p=3309#comment-3520</guid>
		<description>Funny, when I was doing my top ten I had to double check the release dates, man sometimes we get stuff early and sometimes discover albums a year later but still feel like the best of the year.  What a list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny, when I was doing my top ten I had to double check the release dates, man sometimes we get stuff early and sometimes discover albums a year later but still feel like the best of the year.  What a list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://slowcoustic.com/2009/12/09/top-50-albums-of-2009-according-to-das-klienicum-top-50/comment-page-1/#comment-3519</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 23:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slowcoustic.com/?p=3309#comment-3519</guid>
		<description>haha. good question</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha. good question</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: slowcoustic</title>
		<link>http://slowcoustic.com/2009/12/09/top-50-albums-of-2009-according-to-das-klienicum-top-50/comment-page-1/#comment-3517</link>
		<dc:creator>slowcoustic</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:59:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slowcoustic.com/?p=3309#comment-3517</guid>
		<description>Yes, E. is a fiend for posting on a regular basis (and he is just one guy)!

Good catch Lee, I think you are correct...tsk, tsk....  I wonder how long it will take for &quot;leaks&quot; to count as a release as they are starting to leak earlier and earlier!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, E. is a fiend for posting on a regular basis (and he is just one guy)!</p>
<p>Good catch Lee, I think you are correct&#8230;tsk, tsk&#8230;.  I wonder how long it will take for &#8220;leaks&#8221; to count as a release as they are starting to leak earlier and earlier!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee</title>
		<link>http://slowcoustic.com/2009/12/09/top-50-albums-of-2009-according-to-das-klienicum-top-50/comment-page-1/#comment-3515</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 21:00:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slowcoustic.com/?p=3309#comment-3515</guid>
		<description>great list!

but July Flame isn&#039;t released until 2010...(meanwhile, it&#039;s a gorgeous album)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>great list!</p>
<p>but July Flame isn&#8217;t released until 2010&#8230;(meanwhile, it&#8217;s a gorgeous album)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clicky Overload</title>
		<link>http://slowcoustic.com/2009/12/09/top-50-albums-of-2009-according-to-das-klienicum-top-50/comment-page-1/#comment-3513</link>
		<dc:creator>Clicky Overload</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 15:19:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://slowcoustic.com/?p=3309#comment-3513</guid>
		<description>Man, E. really is a busy bee.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Man, E. really is a busy bee.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 1328768388.712 seconds -->

